Gregor Lorenz

Gregor LorenzPersonnel ID: 5639017284
Life Sciences branch emblem
Physical Sciences branch emblem
Information Sciences branch emblem
Combat branch emblem
Security branch emblem
Intelligence branch emblem
Health branch emblem
Infrastructure branch emblem
Relations branch emblem
Oversight branch emblem
Branch — ClassPhysical Sciences — Class 8 (FSC-wide Branch Head)
StatusActive
Primary LocationBase 04
Age63
SexMale
Height6'4"
Hair ColorGray
Skin ToneLight
Description

Raised and educated in Germany before establishing an international scientific career, Gregor Lorenz brings an old-school academic severity to the Physical Sciences Branch. His presence in technical meetings is reportedly more disruptive than his relatively quiet manner would suggest. He rarely dominates discussion, but has a tendency to ask very short questions that force presenters to defend assumptions they had not realized they were making. Lorenz appears largely indifferent to professional reputation when evaluating an argument and has corrected senior FSC officials with the same lack of ceremony shown toward junior researchers. Multiple interviewees described him as intimidating; considerably fewer described him as unfair. He appears to regard intellectual embarrassment as preferable to allowing a bad assumption to survive unchallenged.

His interest in the FSC seems rooted less in containment than opportunity: he considers Wonders the strongest evidence yet encountered that existing physical models are incomplete. During interview, Lorenz described the organization's most valuable resource not as its weapons, facilities, or personnel, but as:

Lorenz: “Access to questions no university on Earth is permitted to ask.”
Supplemental Record

Internal Seminar Recording — Base 04

During an internal Physical Sciences seminar, Lorenz spent nearly forty minutes presenting a proposed model for the behavior of a newly recovered spatial Wonder.

Near the end of the presentation, a junior researcher interrupted and stated that one of Lorenz’s assumptions could not be correct.

According to the recording, the room went noticeably quiet.

Lorenz asked the researcher to explain.

After several minutes of discussion, he handed them the chalk.

The researcher worked through the objection at the board while Lorenz stood beside them without speaking. The contradiction was valid. If the junior researcher’s reasoning was correct, a substantial portion of Lorenz’s model had to be discarded.

Lorenz looked at the board for several seconds, erased the title of his presentation, and replaced it with:

REVISED MODEL — WORK IN PROGRESS

He then took a seat in the front row and instructed the researcher to continue.

The remainder of the seminar became an impromptu examination of the new model.

When another senior researcher later remarked that the interruption had been inappropriate given Lorenz’s position, Lorenz reportedly answered:

Lorenz: “If my position can make an equation correct, then Physical Sciences has become unnecessary.”

The junior researcher was subsequently added to the project team.

The incident is occasionally referenced by Physical Sciences personnel when explaining Lorenz to new staff: he can be unusually difficult to challenge, but considerably more dangerous to work for if personnel become afraid to challenge him at all.

Personnel Observation

Names Are Optional

Lorenz is notoriously poor at remembering people's names.

He can recall a researcher's thesis subject, an argument they made three years earlier, the result of an experiment they assisted with, and sometimes the exact mistake they made in an equation while still failing to remember what they are called.

This has resulted in personnel being addressed as:

Lorenz: “The spectroscopy researcher.”
Lorenz: “You, from Copenhagen.”
Lorenz: “The one who disagreed with me about vacuum polarization.”

Lorenz does eventually learn the names of people he works with regularly.

Unfortunately, personnel report that by the time this occurs, being addressed correctly can feel strangely unsettling.